The studio opened in the autumn of 2019 with one writer, one editor, and the decision that we would not take on work we could not name. Six years later, the four of us still spend the first thirty minutes of every brief deciding whether the engagement is one we should refuse — and only then, if the answer is no, drafting the paragraph that explains why.
We have written for a Helsinki public utility, a Copenhagen restaurant collective, an independent Finnish publisher, a fashion label in our own neighbourhood, a Turku sauna company on its bicentenary, and a single-founder specialty-grain farm on the harvest of 2022. The engagements share almost nothing in common except that, in every case, the client wanted to be read carefully. None of these clients found us through an advertisement, because the studio has not run one.
Why editorial, not marketing?
The word marketing has become, in our part of the industry, a description of volume rather than of communication. Marketing copy is produced quickly, edited lightly, and measured by quantity. Editorial copy is produced slowly, edited closely, and measured by what a reader remembers two weeks after they have read it. The studio is built around the second kind. We refer the first kind to two freelancers we trust and one boutique agency we admire.
The distinction matters because it determines what we will and will not take. A brief that needs forty pieces of competent copy a month is not a brief for us. A brief that needs one finished piece of writing that the rest of the business is waiting on, or a quarter of considered output for a brand that has done the voice work — those briefs are why the studio exists.
"Reading the piece aloud at the desk is the cheapest editorial intervention there is, and the one most often skipped."
Lotta Salminen · Editor's note, autumn 2025
How we read a brief.
Every brief that comes through the door is read by Mikael first — the production lead, who decides whether the engagement is one we have capacity for and one we are the right studio for. If both answers are yes, the brief moves to Lotta, who decides whether the engagement is one we should take on this quarter or one that should wait a quarter. Roughly half of the briefs that survive the first filter are turned down at the second.
The paragraph we send to the briefs we turn down is itself, by now, a small part of the studio's reputation. It thanks the brief for being clear, names the reason we are saying no in a single sentence, points at who we think would do the work well, and ends. It takes fifteen minutes to write. Every one of us writes one because we believe the recipient — even unsuccessful — deserves the paragraph.
What we won't do.
We do not write paid-acquisition copy, social-media content at volume, technical documentation, or SEO content farms. We do not write press releases without an editorial argument inside them, and we do not write founder posts that the founder has not read aloud to us first. We do not draft anything with a language model, and we will not start now. We do not take on engagements we cannot name with two senior people in the room. Most of these are stylistic choices; one of them — the language-model one — is a written policy that we have published and signed.